Question 1

What is the difference between JPG and WEBP?

Accepted Answer

JPG is a long‑standing image format that uses lossy compression to reduce file size, widely supported across all devices, apps, and browsers. It’s best for photos and web images where compatibility is critical, but it doesn’t support transparency and can show visible artifacts at higher compression.
WEBP is a newer format from Google offering both lossy and lossless compression, usually delivering smaller files than JPG at similar quality. It supports transparency (alpha) and animation, with broad modern browser support; however, some older tools may have limited compatibility compared to JPG.

Question 2

Will converting JPG to WEBP reduce image quality?

Accepted Answer

Converting a JPG to WEBP won’t inherently reduce image quality, but it depends on the settings you choose; WEBP is a modern, more efficient format that can deliver the same visual quality at a smaller file size using lossy or lossless compression—if you use high-quality (low compression) settings, the result can look identical to the original JPG, while aggressive compression may introduce artifacts; for best results, start with a high-quality source and select a WEBP quality level around 80–90 to balance clarity and size.

Question 3

How much smaller will my file size be after converting to WEBP?

Accepted Answer

In most cases, converting images to WEBP reduces file size by about 25–35% vs. JPEG and 50–70% vs. PNG, while maintaining similar visual quality. Actual savings depend on image content, resolution, and whether transparency or animation is involved.
Using lossy WEBP typically achieves the biggest reductions, especially for photos and complex scenes. Lossless WEBP still shrinks many graphics compared to PNG but with smaller gains, and sometimes it may even be larger if the source is already highly optimized.
Expect larger savings for large, detailed images and smaller savings for already compressed or simple graphics. To find your best balance, adjust the quality/compression setting and compare the output size and visual fidelity before finalizing.

Question 4

Does WEBP support transparency like PNG does?

Accepted Answer

Yes—WEBP supports transparency. The format includes an alpha channel similar to PNG’s, allowing fully transparent and semi‑transparent pixels for smooth edges and overlays.
There are two WEBP types: lossy and lossless. Both can carry an alpha channel, so you can keep transparency regardless of the compression mode you choose.
Compared to PNG, WEBP often delivers smaller file sizes at similar visual quality while preserving transparency. For maximum fidelity, use lossless WEBP; for lighter files, use lossy WEBP with alpha.

Question 5

Are WEBP images supported by all major browsers and devices?

Accepted Answer

Yes—modern support for WEBP is excellent. Current versions of Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari, and Opera all support WEBP on desktop and mobile. Most Android and iOS devices also handle WEBP in browsers and many native apps.
However, a few older environments lack full support. Legacy versions such as Internet Explorer and older releases of iOS Safari (before iOS 14) do not render WEBP. Some older apps or embedded webviews may also fall back to other formats.
Best practice: serve WEBP with a fallback (e.g., JPEG/PNG) using picture with source or content negotiation. This ensures compatibility while taking advantage of WEBP’s smaller file sizes and support for lossy, lossless, and alpha transparency.

Question 6

What is the best quality setting or compression level for WEBP?

Accepted Answer

The “best” WEBP quality depends on your use case. For photos, a lossy quality value around 70–80 typically delivers a great balance of small file size and visual fidelity. For graphics, logos, or UI with sharp edges and text, prefer lossless WEBP or keep lossy quality higher (e.g., 85–95) to avoid artifacts.
If you need the smallest files for web performance, try quality 60–70 and visually compare results; increase slightly if you notice banding or ringing. For retina or print-like fidelity where detail matters, stick to 80–90. Always review at 100% zoom because small artifacts may only appear at native size.
Advanced tips: enable alpha compression for transparent images, use near-lossless (e.g., 40–60) when you want lossless-like edges with better compression, and consider lossless only for assets needing perfect reproduction. Ultimately, the best setting is the lowest quality that remains visually indistinguishable for your specific content.

Question 7

Will metadata (EXIF/ICC) be preserved when converting to WEBP?

Accepted Answer

Yes—WEBP supports EXIF, XMP, and ICC profiles, so metadata can be preserved when converting. However, whether it is actually kept depends on the converter settings and the source file’s metadata integrity.
By default, many tools strip metadata to reduce file size. To keep it, enable options like “preserve EXIF/XMP” or “retain ICC profile,” or choose a converter that explicitly copies metadata into the WEBP container.
After conversion, verify preservation by inspecting the WEBP with an EXIF viewer or metadata tool. If color looks off, ensure the ICC profile was embedded; if camera or GPS details are missing, the EXIF/XMP data wasn’t transferred.

Question 8

Can I batch convert multiple JPG files to WEBP and keep filenames?

Accepted Answer

Yes—use a tool that supports batch conversion and preserves original filenames. On Windows, PowerShell can do it with ImageMagick: magick mogrify -path output -format webp *.jpg keeps names (file.jpg → file.webp). On macOS/Linux, run the same command in Terminal. With ffmpeg: for f in *.jpg; do ffmpeg -i

Convert JPG to WEBP Online & Free

More online JPG converters to change your images

Frequently Asked Questions About Converting JPG to WEBP