Question 1

Will the BMP file be larger than my original JPG?

Accepted Answer

In most cases, yes—the resulting BMP will be significantly larger than your original JPG. That’s because JPG uses lossy compression to shrink file size, while BMP stores pixel data uncompressed.
The exact size increase depends on image dimensions and color depth. A typical photo saved as BMP can be many times larger than the same image saved as JPG, since every pixel is stored directly without compression.
Choose BMP only if you need uncompressed, simple raster data for compatibility or editing. If smaller size is important, consider formats with compression (e.g., JPG, PNG) instead.

Question 2

What quality settings should I use to avoid visible artifacts in the BMP?

Accepted Answer

BMP is a lossless format, so there’s no “quality” slider like in JPEG. To avoid visible artifacts, export or convert to BMP with the original bit depth and color profile intact (e.g., 24-bit RGB or 32-bit RGBA if transparency is needed). Avoid downsampling, dithering, or palette reduction (8-bit/256 colors) unless file size is a priority; these introduce banding or speckling.
Ensure the source image is high quality before conversion—fix compression artifacts at the source (e.g., use a high-quality PNG or HEIF) and disable any color subsampling or compression in the pipeline. If you must reduce size, prefer RLE-compressed BMP for simple graphics, keep resolution and bit depth consistent, and verify results at 100% zoom to catch banding or color shifts.

Question 3

Does converting JPG to BMP make the image truly lossless?

Accepted Answer

No—converting a JPG to BMP does not make the image truly lossless. The JPG already contains compression artifacts from its original lossy encoding, and those lost details cannot be recovered by saving it as a BMP. The BMP will preserve the current pixels without further loss (it’s an uncompressed format), but it cannot restore the original quality that was discarded during the JPG’s initial compression; you only get a larger file of the same visual content and imperfections.

Question 4

What’s the difference between JPG and BMP formats?

Accepted Answer

JPG is a compressed, lossy image format that significantly reduces file size by discarding some data, making it ideal for photos and web use where smaller files and good visual quality matter; it supports millions of colors but can show compression artifacts after repeated edits. In contrast, BMP is an uncompressed (or lightly compressed) raster format that preserves every pixel for exact fidelity, resulting in very large files; it’s simple, widely compatible on Windows, and better for editing, archiving, or images requiring pixel-perfect accuracy, but not efficient for sharing or web use.

Question 5

Will metadata (EXIF) be preserved after conversion to BMP?

Accepted Answer

In most cases, EXIF metadata is not preserved when converting images to the BMP format. BMP is a simple raster format that typically doesn’t store camera data, geolocation, orientation, or other EXIF fields embedded in formats like JPEG or HEIF.
If you need to retain metadata, consider converting to formats that support EXIF (e.g., JPEG, TIFF, or PNG with XMP) or export a separate .xmp sidecar. You can also copy EXIF from the source file to the BMP using a metadata tool after conversion, but BMP itself won’t carry it by default.

Question 6

Can I keep the original color profile and bit depth when converting to BMP?

Accepted Answer

Yes, but with limitations: BMP can preserve the original bit depth (e.g., 24‑bit, 32‑bit with alpha) if you select a matching output, yet it does not natively store modern ICC color profiles like HEIF does; BMP is typically assumed to be sRGB without embedded profiles. To maintain visual accuracy, convert colors to sRGB during export and choose an appropriate bit depth (24‑bit for no transparency, 32‑bit for alpha). If preserving the exact profile is critical, consider formats that support embedded ICC profiles (e.g., PNG or TIFF) instead of BMP.

Question 7

Why does my BMP look different in color or brightness compared to the JPG?

Accepted Answer

JPG and BMP handle color and compression differently. JPG is a compressed, often lossy format that may alter colors and brightness through chroma subsampling and tone curves. BMP is typically uncompressed, preserving raw pixel data, so it can appear sharper or brighter compared to the same image saved as JPG.
Another common cause is color profiles. A JPG may embed an ICC profile (like sRGB) that some apps honor, while BMPs often lack embedded profiles. If your viewer treats unmanaged BMPs as sRGB or ignores profiles entirely, you’ll see shifts in saturation, contrast, or gamma.
To minimize differences: ensure both files use the same color space (e.g., sRGB), disable or match color management in your software, export JPGs with the same gamma and without heavy compression or subsampling, and view both images in a color‑managed application.

Question 8

Are transparency or alpha channels supported when converting JPG to BMP?

Accepted Answer

No. Standard JPG does not contain an alpha channel, so any transparency present in the original source is already lost when saved as JPG. When you convert that JPG to BMP, the resulting file will not have transparency because there is none to preserve from the JPG.
While some BMP variants can store an alpha channel, typical JPG-to-BMP conversions produce 24-bit BMPs without transparency. If you need to keep transparency, start from a format that supports it (e.g., PNG, HEIF/HEIC with alpha) and convert to a BMP variant or another format that preserves alpha.

Convert JPG to BMP Online & Free

More online JPG converters to change your images

FAQs about converting JPG to BMP